Integrating African, Eastern and Western Spirituality

In the past African, Eastern and Western spirituality have been seperate. Times have changed. We live during an interesting time, during the convergence of these three along with their peoples, histories, religions, spiritualities and wisdoms for living. The postmodernist outlook critiques these worldviews, these ways of being in and explaining the world as experienced by people. It is now clear that none of these worldviews fully capture human experience. Within each lies wisdom for living. This wisdom relates both to this world and to truths, both perceived through human effort and communicated by persons from beyond our world, extending beyond the confines of our living. These truths are available to us along with a rich variety of practices for living healthily within while being succesfully integrated with what lies beyond the confines of our world.
We’re living during the emergence of a new worldview, of a meta-culture integrating African, Eastern and Western contributions. The roots of this new worldview lie in part with modernity and in part with postmodernity. Modernisation shattered our delusions and superstitions and opened us up to each other. When the West modernised, we abandoned Western spirituality. We threw the baby out with the bathwater and our faith (along with the environment and its’ people) became the casuality. Similarly, as Africa and the East modernise their religions, spiritualities and wisdoms for living are threatened. Fortunately along came postmodernism, which shattered the pretensiousness of the West and opened us up to the heart and mystery within each religion. It is from here that the problem of Godde emerges for our generation – who and what is Godde and how can S/He be known. Now people want to be spiritual, open to Godde and mystery, but not religious, boxed in by outdated worldviews and dogmatism.
It is in light of this that I suggest that we distinguish between the human side and the divine side to religion and spirituality. The human side is everything we practice and do when we talk about religion and spirituality. The divine side is who and what we connect with when we speak about the focus or object or objective of our religion and everything that thing or person or philosophy or experience brings to the table. Though religions differ in terms of who and what Godde is and how S/He may be known the variety of practices available add to the menu available through which people may experience Godde. It is my proposal that Africa, the East and the West all serve as significant storehouses for the intrepid spiritual adventurer.
I believe not only that Christianity can integrate foreign spiritual practices but also that we should proactively and responsibly do so. Christianity, at least the bit I’m speaking to and about, is Western and Westernised. Contributions from Africa will critique and enrich our relationship with the environment and each other. Contributions from the East will critique our relationship with our essential self. Each of the great continents – Africa, the East and the West – contains a wealth of wisdom and truth that we can benefit from. Similarly, the West contributes to and critiques Africa and the East. As all religion and spirituality is partial and limited there is a lot of scope in each for further development within each broad category. We can set our mind on healthily integrating spiritual practices from a wide variety of religions and spiritualities and wisdoms for living across the African, Eastern and Western continents.
I like that you have a positive view on the postmodern. It’s usually those who are mistake the Western for the Christian who are most threatened by pomo or by any attempt to see the blessings of heterodoxy.
We will need to explore this further. One starting reservation of mine, for instance, is that I feel my relationship with Africa is very tenuous and abstract. I am not sure what to believe about Africa, despite having seen myself as African for almost a decade of my life.
But I feel a freedom from the obligation to be “relevant” that we felt during the struggle against apartheid, and I suppose this is a good thing, because it coloured my perceptions tremendously.
I think those moving toward a pomo view will have abstract relationships with most of what they seek to appropriate. It is the “repetition” of the wisdom we find for our own context that is important. After all, we have our humanity and our planet in common.
What do you mean by your last paragraph? Sounds like something interesting to explore.
This is a grand debate, even for us that are post all sorts of things (maybe even po-pomo, as possibly the ridicule is over and utopia can be still found).
It is one thing to respect, learn from and accept other belief systems and view the sacred as myth but when it comes down to faith I’m left standing alone. Not alone without faith but alone with faith. Now, I can ignore my soul and pretend the faith that I have is not real or deal with the minuscule light and follow it.
The problem created by recognising the smallest particle of faith is that it isolates the individual. The individual becomes me and my belief.
Regarding religions and religious societies from around the world, yes, there are obvious similarities that beg certain questioning as to the ultimate origin. Each path offers a different view into a prism.
However, I live in an age where many of the cultural barriers that prevented me from understanding the teachings of other religions have been removed. I live in a global urban environment linked by tin cans in the sky and wifi. This reality along with the planet in distress and my personal identity almost invisible leads to anxiety and a question of faith in what.
So, I come back to dealing with this molecule of faith. I stand up a say out softly, so no-one can hear, “Jesus”.
Immediately, I’m in trouble with myself as the history of 2000 years of religious shit falls onto my head. So, I take a step backwards and fall off a cliff. As I fall I realise that others with faith surround me. We fall together into space with doubts and love.
FEOTU, I believe that’s problem of Godde for our time. We still want to connect meaningfully with Godde, but we don’t want to buy wholesale into previous worldviews, prior narratives.
So how do we meaningfully construct our own private narrative while participating in the broader conversation taking place around us? Somehow the private, the communal, and the public go together.
Hopefully I can offer some meaningful suggestions enabling us to do share this conversation with our fellow humans for it is our humanity we have in common. In this series of conversations I’ll be focusing on the human side to religion and spirituality and hopefully facilitate conversations holding sufficient tention between doubt and certainty without allusions to some a priori, some given and absolute predefined foundation that isn’t open to question and discussion.
Tim,
I look forward to continuing this probing into the human dilemmas of faith and doubt and seeing God.
“And we, who with unveiled faces all reflect the Lord’s glory, are being transformed into his likeness with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.” 2 Cor3v8
I like your distinction between the human and divine side of spirituality. I find I often connect more with people who practice spirituality outside of the Christian faith than those within the faith that aren’t practicing spirituality. I vaguely recall the story of a Christian monk who became friends with a Bhuddist monk, and invited him to spend some time at his monastry. At first, the other Christian monks were opposed to him, but their final conclusion of him was that although he differed from them regarding what he believed, his way of life was exactly the same as their own. They thus embraced him. (Now, where did I read that story?!.
Looking forwards to a response on my email from last year! Enjoying your blog!
Tim. thanks for this post & and also to those who have responded so far.
reading it, the question that came to mind was: how does one respond to another tradition that challenges some of one’s fundamental beliefs, to the point that one feels that one has discovered a greater, more liberating truth?
i experienced this sort of deep resonance when i begun exploring jewish kabbalah around a decade ago. the same could be said for buddhism, elements of paganism, the radical non-duality of advaita etc.
i couldn’t say it any better than Andy, who spoke about 2000 yrs of religious shit falling on his head. i’d also add my 20+ years of personal entanglement in christian theology. as much as i love the emergent conversation and writers like Malcolm McLaren, for me it feels like a genuine & passionate attempt to re-arrange the furniture, when in fact a complete reconstruction of foundations is required.
maybe i am already a post-christian but don’t want to come out as one & embrace it.
LL,
Thanks for the encouragement and the question.
I fear I must ramble a bit for now cause I’ve got this as the subject of my next blog post (I’m about half way through writing it and need to get the diagrams right).
I believe there’s definately a maturing that comes from interacting with truth from as well as between the various spiritual traditions and religions.
I’ve really enjoyed participation in a variety of conversations from participating in the interfaith dialogue through to evangelised by various religious/spiritual people from occultists through to muslims, hindus and buddhists, through to growing as an ambassador of Godde.
The conversation within Christianity around distinguishing between the “crappy” bits of the faith along with the mutual complicities in western crimes against humanity and Creation to get to the essential core is both important and fruitful to many. I would however like to hear the conversation move beyond changing the forms of expression and about essential theological concerns toward the praxis of faith but that’s another story.
It does sound like you no longer consider yourself a representative of evangelical Christianity at the very least and that you now speak as a seeker between faiths with esoteric leanings (unless I’ve misread you).
I believe that the “maturing” I mention earlier can be distinguished from, though it is often related to, the move away from Christianity and being a representative of the Christian faith. Often the experience of a “greater, more liberating truth” relates to it’s felt reality.
I’m sometimes amused by Daniel not getting eaten and yet so many Christians who chose to worship Jesus and not Caesar got eaten by lions. In terms of ‘felt immediate reality’ they got a sucky deal but took it in light of a deeper salvation, a truth that liberated them.
Ultimate salvation belongs to the eschaton (in whatever form it will come) and the real “greater truths” are bound to whoever the real Messiah, for want of a better term, is.
Tim. yeah you’re right, i certainly have strong esoteric leanings and would roughly class myself as a mystical christian.
i have a number of friends who are more “orthodox” and very involved in the organised church – one or two i would consider my spiritual elders, full of love & virtue. however key teachings such as atonement theology and grace as unmerited favour no longer hold meaning for me.
i see Christ as a liberator figure rather than a sacrifice to appease a deity that demands blood in order to forgive. i don’t believe i can build a balanced life or a meaningful praxis of faith on such foundations.
i salute your explorations into the integration of eastern, western & african spirituality. personally i sense that continuing to hold on to the dualistic teaching of atonement theology & grace as unmerited favour will fundamentally undermine such integration, beyond taking some of their practices – yoga, meditation, shamanism etc – and assimilating them into a foreign dualistic modality.
what’s your take on that?
thanks, russ.
Hi Russ,
You seem to hold strongly to the notion of a discrepancy between the Godde of the OT and the Godde of the NT. I don’t share that same distinction, which makes for quite a different head and heart space between us. This is something I’d love to explore a bit further if you’re keen. I’m always open to having my assumptions and biases challenged.
I must admit that I’m superficially familiar with the view based on my reading of gnosticism a few years back. I reckon a deeper conversation is required in order to more farely and fully comment. Otherwise one or both of us may be having conversations with “straw men” rather than each other.
I see Jesus as eschatological prototype, transcending our present humanity through incarnation, death and resurrrection, as well as being fully Godde, the very same Godde of the OT, both during his earth sojourn and beyond as S/He continues to serve Godde and humanity.
I don’t feel that I hold to a dualistic tension between atonement and grace. Also, I believe that what “worship” means and likes like involves the participation of Godde and humans more fully. In my past church experience one or both were often not fully present.
I personally believe (romantic notions aside):
- the East offers much to do with people becoming more human centered and discovering the oneness of reality along with the ‘emptiness’ that lies between Creation and Godde.
- the Primal, African and other, offers much to do with relationships between people present, future and past as well as with the environment, with stewarding the environment.
- the Western offers an honesty, a clarity and insight enabling us to get beyond superstition and bullshit present in religion and spirituality as well as through our own steam attain a measure of salvation and become co-creators and co-stewards with Godde.
I resonate both with the person who spoke of “2000 years of religious shit,” and with the one who spoke of moving toward “the praxis of faith.” In my own blog – sunfiresblog.wordpress.com – I recount an experience that came from practicing a ritual given to me by an African teacher. I have had other experiences working with Native American teachers and teahers who have studied in India. I’m sure accounts of some of them will make their way to my blog in the future. I’m interested in reading about the experiences of others, much more than i am about any theories and theological debates.
I totally agree with you Sunfire, but I do believe that good praxis and good theory go hand in hand, each feeding into and developing the other.
When people speak about their experiences, their feelings, their intentions and desires the conversation is often so much richer with people clearly more present. Conversations on theory usually revolve around opinions and grinding personal axes and lean toward the abstract. I’d much rather speak with people.
Sacred Sexuality sounds very interesting. Am I right in understanding that it’s a contemporary expression of Tantra?
Religious shit has been around a LOT longer than 2000 years.
Obviously the 2M mark impunes christianity (possibly more than other faiths). I’d say that christianity (a somewhat abstract idea IMO) inherited, propogated (and even possibly dealt with), a lot of shit.
But to focus on Jesus is a different story. Not only did he wade through more religious shit than you or I ever will, his wisdom seems to me to be a pretty good guide through it all.
Timvoctor asked if Sacred Sexuality is a contemporary expression of Tantra? Sacred Sexuality has roots in Taoist, Tantric, and Native American practices. References to similar practices can be found in many religious traditions – including one fragment of an ancient document that suggests that Jesus may have used Sacred Sexuality in the initiation of disciples.
On the subject of Jesus, I’d like to comment on the differences you mentioned between to OT and NT Godde. I find less of a difference here than between the Godde of the NT and the trinitarian Godde that developed after the NT was written. There are no passages in the NT that support a trinitarian Godde (other than one verse which doesn’t exist in the oldest texts). That doctrine came about several centuries after Jesus. For a discussion, check out The Many Faces of Jesus: A Critical Look at Christianity
by Richard E. Wilde.