A recent synchroblog around church as missional got me thinking a bit around how both continuity and discontinuity can be faithful and unfaithful.
With Christianity there isn’t just a single point of departure or reference point. To be Christian is to point back to the historical Jesus as well as forward to the return of Jesus the Risen LORD as well as the relationship with Godde in the present through the Holy Spirit.
During the Reformation a Catholic recognised that the institution he was a part of had carefully laid a set of tracks from the historical Jesus to where they were at. He also recognised that at some point they’d gone off course. Though they were laying tracks moving away from the historical Jesus they weren’t laying tracks headed toward the return of the Risen LORD. There was continuity but there continuity was unfaithful.
Oddly enough, discontinuity can be faithful. There are any number of churches built without historical continuity that pick up from their historical present the line between the historical Jesus of the past and the returning LORD of the future.
In terms of present-continuous experience an individual or group can be unfaithful if they’re not connecting with Godde in the present. One can point back historically and point forward eschatologically but if one is not rooted in relationship with Godde in the present then one is also not being faithful.
I guess the challenge for the emerging church to develop each tangent responsibly.